Relation
How one resource points at another, and what the pointing means.
Associated resource and its relationship to the resource being described
BIBFRAME's definition of
bf:Relation. The primer has a section on it.
Example
{
"@type": [
"Relation"
],
"relationship": [
{
"@id": "http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relationship/series"
}
]
}Trimmed from a real record rather than written for the occasion, and checked against this definition by tests/test_examples.py. A wrong example is worse than none, because it is the first thing anyone copies.
Properties
| Property | Takes | What BIBFRAME says it is |
|---|---|---|
rdfs:label | Text | defined by RDF Schema |
relationship | Ref | Type of relationship between resources |
associatedResource | Resource | Associated resource |
seriesEnumeration | Text | Series enumeration of the resource; usually transcribed. |
Every property here holds an array, and a property this definition does not name is still checked: it must be an array too. Naming a property buys a check on what its values look like, and nothing else.
The schema
https://bibframe-json.org/schema/linked/Relation.json is this definition on its own, and https://bibframe-json.org/schema/linked.json is the whole shape with every definition inlined. They are checked against each other over the conformance corpus, so either is safe to depend on.